Version: (using KDE KDE 3.5.4) Installed from: FreeBSD Ports OS: FreeBSD Third comes the title field. Frankly I'm not sure about this, perhaps it makes sense to leave it in. But at any rate it makes sense to at least think about dropping it, because journal entries tend to be and certainly can be identified by their date and time, and this is how they normally do get identified in real world journals (who has time to invent a matching title every time? ;-) ) Note: initially posted here http://lists.kde.org/?l=kdepim-users&m=115969696715217&w=2
Transferring discussion from kdepim-users: Allen Winter said: Another good point. What if we fill in a default title like "Journal for <date>" ?? Seems like something we shouldn't remove since sometimes you will want a title. Answer: Right, I've updated the BR title to reflect this. Sometimes a special title might be needed indeed (for instance to record completed todos). Perhaps it would be best to have default titles like 24-12-2005, Evening (or even something crazy like Christmas Eve, 2005) 20-03-2006, Noon And if more than one entry falls within the 'Noon' interval, call it 20-03-2006, Noon (Second Entry) Just a suggestion, maybe it can be even more clever or maybe it's not deemed necessary and then it's just 24-12-2005, 19:04
Reassigning all KOrganizer bug reports and wishes to the newly created korganizer-devel mailing list.
Added as part of the KOrganizer Journal GUI revamp. New journal entries are in the format: Journal for $DATE. Fixed in KDE 4.x.