Bug 133488 - make it possible to enlarge image in the 'comments and tags' dialog
Summary: make it possible to enlarge image in the 'comments and tags' dialog
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Tags-Captions (show other bugs)
Version: 0.8.0
Platform: Slackware Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-09-03 12:25 UTC by Michał Kosmulski
Modified: 2022-01-22 10:14 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 7.6.0


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michał Kosmulski 2006-09-03 12:25:27 UTC
Version:           0.8.0 (using KDE KDE 3.5.3)
Installed from:    Slackware Packages
OS:                Linux

In the Image Comments/Tags dialog box, the image is sometimes a bit too small to see all details and so in order to check whether it's the correct image I'm tagging, I have to close the dialog and view the image full-size in the viewer. It would be very nice to be able to:
* have the image in the dialog grow when the dialog box is enlarged
* have the option to enlarge the image or a part of it - either by adding some zoom controls to the window, or by showing a small portion of the image in 1:1 scale when the right mouse button is pressed over the image (this is how zooming is handled in xdvi for example)
Comment 1 caulier.gilles 2006-09-03 12:53:23 UTC
Michal,

This bug report is invalid, since in digiKam 0.9.0 the dialog have been remplaced by a side bar in Album GUI and Image Editor. Take a look of the screenshot available at this url:

http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/Screenshots/CommentsAndTagsFromAlbumGUI.png
http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/Screenshots/CommentsAndTagsFromImageEditor.png

Note: first 0.9.0-beta1 is already released. 0.9.0-beta2 is planed during september. I recommend you, if you can, to test current implementation from svn trunk.

Gilles Caulier
Comment 2 Michał Kosmulski 2006-09-03 15:52:15 UTC
OK, thanks. This seems to solve my problem.