Bug 132209 - "Group By Artist" should hide "Various Artists" (optionally)
Summary: "Group By Artist" should hide "Various Artists" (optionally)
Status: REOPENED
Alias: None
Product: amarok
Classification: Applications
Component: Collection Browser (show other bugs)
Version: 2.3-GIT
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Amarok Developers
URL:
Keywords:
: 264684 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-08-10 16:33 UTC by Ingo Müller
Modified: 2011-12-23 10:04 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ingo Müller 2006-08-10 16:33:45 UTC
Version:           1.4.1 (using KDE KDE 3.5.2)
Installed from:    Ubuntu Packages
OS:                Linux

Hi!

I saw a couple of discussions about that topic and it seems to be quite controversal. I didn't find anything that fitted exactly my vision of how it should be, though.

The situation is as follows: Most of my songs are grouped as albums with songs of one artist only. Some albums are compilations though with hundreds of artists together. What I'd like to do is to show all the albums as well as the compilations and view the artist of the album (except the compilations). Like this:

+Various Artist
 +Compilation 1
 +Compilation 2
 ...
+Artist 1
 +Album 1
 +Album 2
+Artist 2
...

The first part is possible with amarok 1.4.1: I see the list of all albums by choosing "Group by Album", but I don't see the according artists name. If I choose "Group by Artist/Album" instead, I see a list of hundreds of artists, each with one song on one compilation. They are listed in "Various Artists", too.

As other people seem to prefer a different behaviour than I do, I have the following proposition: Every time I can choose "Artist", I could be able to choose "Artist (no various artists)", too, so it would group the various artists. This would not harm the possibilities other people have at the moment.

Unfourtunately, I don't feel capable of contributing code, but I hope you think about my wishes anyway :-)

Greetings, Ingo Müller

BTW: The "Show under various artists" is a VERY GREAT idea!! I just want it to show it under various artists *only*.
Comment 1 Seb Ruiz 2006-08-10 16:41:11 UTC
There is no need to provide extra options to the user. We are faced to make life changing decisions everyday in Amarok, and this is one of them.

However, i do see your point, Compilation albums make no sense when viewing the browser without albums showing.
Comment 2 Ben Johnson 2006-09-29 00:07:57 UTC
Bugs 125837, 132209, and 125689 seem related. 125689 has a patch. Maybe a developer could review that? 
Comment 3 Josh Berry 2007-01-06 01:01:53 UTC
I agree -- viewing by artist (or by some combination of artist/genre) should completely remove Various Artists and list songs under the correct artist.

I was trying to use the collection browser--grouped by artists only--to go through and clean up my artist tags (fix misspellings and the like).  But now I can't do this, because some songs show up under the artist name, but others show up under "Various Artists".  This process is now much more tedious for me than it otherwise would be.
Comment 4 Georg Sauthoff 2008-03-29 10:47:06 UTC
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***
Comment 5 Matt Rogers 2009-08-03 04:03:38 UTC
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug for Amarok. Amarok 1.4 is now unmaintained and will no longer see any improvements. Because of this, and the massive amount of changes Amarok has undergone throughout the 2.x series of releases, we are closing bugs that no longer apply to the 2.x series due to changes in functionality, the underlying architecture, or a conflict for the vision of Amarok 2.

We appreciate the time you took to provide feedback about Amarok 1.4 and will look forward to any feedback you may provided about Amarok 2. Thanks.
Comment 6 Roman S. 2009-08-03 17:44:15 UTC
Why have you closed this feature request? This is still relevant, AFAIK Amarok 2.x still cannot do this!
Comment 7 Josh Berry 2009-08-03 19:11:46 UTC
Re-opening and moving to a currently-supported version.
Comment 8 Simeon 2011-12-20 14:45:27 UTC
This wish has been granted.This report should be removed.
Comment 9 Myriam Schweingruber 2011-12-20 18:55:59 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> This wish has been granted.This report should be removed.
Rubbish, this is not implemented at all.
Comment 10 Mark S. 2011-12-23 05:54:16 UTC
This bug seems to be related to bug 264684. It may possibly be a duplicate
Comment 11 Myriam Schweingruber 2011-12-23 10:04:13 UTC
*** Bug 264684 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 Myriam Schweingruber 2011-12-23 10:04:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> This bug seems to be related to bug 264684. It may possibly be a duplicate

Well spotted, thank you :)