Version: (using KDE KDE 3.5.2) Installed from: Ubuntu Packages OS: Linux It seems to happen inconsistently: When Ctrl is used to toggle the accessibility keys (and their respective tooltips), particularly if the view is further down on longer pages with many links, no tooltips appear because they are all higher/earlier in the page. It would be useful if a default option existed to show accessibility tooltips only on the visible parts of the canvas. If 'spare' access keys were available (and only when applicable, e.g. scroll space above, below, left or right), access key tooltips could be shown for the scrollbars (to top/bottom, PgUp/PgDn etc). This would simply enhance accessibility by reducing the number of key presses needed to navigate around the page by one. Marginal but significant, as determined by context/user.
looks like a dupe of Bug 126766, but this one has a better summary/idea for a fix imho
the only problem with this fix, is that often. there are more links visible than there are keys on the keyboard.
A possible solution to the higher number of links than keys: -Generate blank shortcuts; -When mapping is toggled with [Ctrl], enable the cursor keys to move; the "selected shortcut" caret/focus to the next logical shortcut widget, according to positioning; -[Return]/[Enter] can be use to follow the link or shortcut that has focus -If the accessibility widget has a key mapped to it then pressing that key will still also work; -[PgUp] and [PgDn] scroll the window and force a re-mapping of keyboard shortcut widgets; This improves to accessibility even if it forces the use of two or more keys sometimes, because only one key needs to be pressed at a time; (Please vote for this bug report.) I do not know if this is currently possible, depending on the modifier functionality of cursor keys in combination with [Ctrl].
Withdrawn pending KDE4 release. Report to be moved to wiki. http://wiki.kde.org/
WTF, this bug has not been fixed. it is a trivial fix, and it is a MAJOR bug for those of use who are disabled. Don't mark it a WORKSFORME!!!i