Bug 124384 - kate and kdevelop hotkeys "fold" together
Summary: kate and kdevelop hotkeys "fold" together
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 108083
Alias: None
Product: kdevplatform
Classification: Developer tools
Component: editor integration (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kdevelop-bugs-null
URL:
Keywords:
: 80170 123435 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-27 22:23 UTC by Imre Péntek
Modified: 2008-08-23 22:54 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Imre Péntek 2006-03-27 22:23:10 UTC
Version:           3.3.1 (using KDE KDE 3.5.1)
Installed from:    Unlisted Binary Package
Compiler:          gcc version 3.4.5 Configured with: /var/uhubuild/work/compile/configure --prefix=/usr --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib --host=i586-uhu-linux; Thread model: posix
OS:                Linux

So I define F2 in kdevelop as the hotkey for save all. Then I close kdevelop, open kwrite and define F2 as save. I close kwrite and launch kdevelop, in the hotkeys list there is two F2 hotkey: one for save, one for save all. I think in kdevelop the kdevelop specific (which one was set using kdevelop) setting should override the kwrite (kate) specific one, and anyways there's no reason to prohibit one f2-save-all-for-kdevelop and one f2-save-for-kwrite to coexist. (As current behaviour kdevelop only saves the current tab after setting the hotkey in kwrite).
Comment 1 Amilcar do Carmo Lucas 2006-03-28 10:55:00 UTC
As far as I know this is a KDE 3.x architectural problem.
This might get solved in KDE 4 if the kdelibs starts to support it.
Comment 2 Jens Dagerbo 2006-03-29 13:11:37 UTC
Amilcar is right. It's an architectural problem with kparts (with independent plugins in general, really), it's a dupe, and it's virtually unsolvable.
Comment 3 Jens Dagerbo 2006-04-07 22:58:29 UTC
*** Bug 123435 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Jens Dagerbo 2006-04-08 01:26:17 UTC
*** Bug 80170 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Andreas Kling 2006-07-16 15:50:14 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 108083 ***