Bug 124278 - return type in class diagram does not get displayed if the class doesn't exist
Summary: return type in class diagram does not get displayed if the class doesn't exist
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 122497
Alias: None
Product: umbrello
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Umbrello Development Group
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-26 05:59 UTC by Karl Pietrzak
Modified: 2006-03-26 14:51 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
PRE: missing return type (96.21 KB, image/png)
2006-03-26 06:08 UTC, Karl Pietrzak 		Details
POST: return type there because the class exists (97.17 KB, image/png)
2006-03-26 06:08 UTC, Karl Pietrzak 		Details
View All Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Karl Pietrzak 2006-03-26 05:59:43 UTC 
Version:           1.5.1 (using KDE 3.4.2 Level "b" , SUSE 10.0)
Compiler:          Target: x86_64-suse-linux
OS:                Linux (x86_64) release 2.6.13-15.8-default

How to reproduce:
1. Create a class, add an Operation, and set its return type to a non-existent class.

The return type will not appear in the diagram.

2. Create a new class with that previously non-existent type.

The return type in the first class will still not show up.

3. Go to the Operations section of that first class, edit that operation, but don't change anything.  Just keep hitting OK.

Now, the return type displays.

See the screenshots for a visual comparison of what I mean, which is probably more meaningful than this description.
Comment 1 Karl Pietrzak 2006-03-26 06:08:11 UTC 
Created attachment 15309 [details]
PRE: missing return type
Comment 2 Karl Pietrzak 2006-03-26 06:08:48 UTC 
Created attachment 15310 [details]
POST: return type there because the class exists
Comment 3 Oliver Kellogg 2006-03-26 14:51:48 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 122497 ***