Bug 120587 - [liboscar] shows invisible contacts as offline when on the other side's visible list
Summary: [liboscar] shows invisible contacts as offline when on the other side's visib...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: kopete
Classification: Unmaintained
Component: ICQ and AIM Plugins (other bugs)
Version First Reported In: 0.11
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kopete Developers
URL:
Keywords:
: 120633 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-01-22 11:59 UTC by Heinrich Wendel
Modified: 2006-02-15 18:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Heinrich Wendel 2006-01-22 11:59:45 UTC 
Version:           0.11 (using KDE 3.5.0, Kubuntu Package 4:3.5.0-0ubuntu0breezy2 )
Compiler:          Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
OS:                Linux (x86_64) release 2.6.12-10-amd64-generic

The subject says it all ;) Protocol is Oscar. If someone is invisible and talks to me, I can talk to him, that's no problem, but he is still shown offline, even when i'm on his visible list.
Comment 1 Matt Rogers 2006-01-22 13:28:30 UTC 
no, now the subject says it all. :P

Can you provide proof that you are on the other person's visible list?
Comment 2 Heinrich Wendel 2006-01-22 16:44:47 UTC 
No I can't. But even if i'm not on his visible list and he talks to me, he should be shown as online/invisible and not offline.
Comment 3 Matt Rogers 2006-01-22 17:47:29 UTC 
ok, well, then there's two items here. If the person on the other side has set up their ICQ so that they allow you to see their status all the time and you don't see their status even when they're invisible, then that's a bug. 

The other part about being shown as online/invisible and not offline is a different thing. Please file it as a wishlist against the ICQ and AIM plugins
Comment 4 Matt Rogers 2006-01-31 17:37:24 UTC 
*** Bug 120633 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Heinrich Wendel 2006-02-15 18:00:31 UTC 
since the protocol change it works as excpected