Bug 116252 - failed to update db on nfs shares
Summary: failed to update db on nfs shares
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Database-Media (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Fedora RPMs Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-11-13 17:47 UTC by Otto Brandstaetter
Modified: 2022-01-14 10:07 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 7.5.0


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Otto Brandstaetter 2005-11-13 17:47:54 UTC
Version:           0.8.0-rc (using KDE KDE 3.4.3)
Installed from:    Fedora RPMs
OS:                Linux

Updated from digikam-0.7.4 to 0.8.0-rc using apt on Fedora Core 3 with kde 3.4.3.
After that, I got "Failed to update old Database to new Database format" and digikam exited when using an album path on a nfs-share. After moving the albums to a local hdd, everything worked fine. This is definitely not a rights-specific problem, I triple-checked this. Even after creating an empty folder on a nfs-share and setting this path in digicamrc, the error appeared. Strange...
Comment 1 Tom Albers 2005-11-13 22:24:39 UTC
There are various problems concerning nfs. We made a solution to place the database on another location with a special hack. So if you insist in using nfs, please consider using that hack. It can be found elsewhere in bko. It is beyond the scope of digiKam to fix these issues.
Comment 2 Axel Mueller 2005-12-04 19:08:54 UTC
I experienced that problem as well when I placed the Digikam database on a volume mounted via NFS version 3. The problem did no longer exist when I switched to NFS version 4 although it is not much fun even with 100 MBit/s. Using it over 54 MBit/s WLAN is not really an option.
Comment 3 Chris Bayley 2006-03-30 21:30:32 UTC
I have spent quite time searching for the aforementioned 'hack' (just short of the time required to rehack it myself I would guess!) and can't locate it so if anyone has a reference to it I would be greatful !
Comment 4 Tom Albers 2006-03-31 09:39:01 UTC
gg: digikam nfs 
1st result, although 2nd is better ;-)
Comment 5 Hugh Warrington 2006-04-17 01:58:07 UTC
This seems to be relevant:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.digikam.devel/2166/