Bug 73381

Summary:	Browsing a directory with files, konqueror doesnt jump across the files anymore, when entering name via keyboard.
Product:	[Applications] konqueror	Reporter:	Christian Muehlhaeuser <muesli>
Component:	general	Assignee:	Konqueror Developers <konq-bugs>
Status:	RESOLVED NOT A BUG
Severity:	normal	CC:	andihartmann, olivier.fisette
Priority:	NOR
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Compiled Sources
OS:	Linux
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed In:

Description Christian Muehlhaeuser 2004-01-24 04:18:05 UTC

Version:            (using KDE KDE 3.2.0)
Installed from:    Compiled From Sources

When I'm browsing a directory with files, I used to enter the filename on the keyboard and konqueror jumped across the filelist to the according files.

This doesn't happen here anymore since KDE_3_2_BRANCH cvs compile from 2004-01-22.

Comment 1 Christian Muehlhaeuser 2004-01-24 04:23:14 UTC

AH!

*damn* forgot: this only happens in "Detailed List View"!

regards
...muesli

Comment 2 Thiago Macieira 2004-01-24 04:51:32 UTC

Can't reproduce. It works fine for me, 3_2_BRANCH dated 20040121 (one day earlier) in Detailed List View.

Comment 3 Christian Muehlhaeuser 2004-01-24 05:59:28 UTC

okay, found out more about it :-)

it works if you're sorting for the name, but not for anything else (like file-type or modified).

...muesli

Comment 4 Thiago Macieira 2004-01-24 06:22:54 UTC

Sorry, I still can't reproduce.

Comment 5 Pascal Létourneau 2004-01-24 22:27:59 UTC

With Qt 3.3, the sorted column is used to find the item.
I also find this new behavior annoying...

Comment 6 Pascal Létourneau 2004-02-21 08:56:31 UTC

*** Bug 72708 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Pascal Létourneau 2004-04-30 20:35:33 UTC

*** Bug 77610 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Martin Koller 2006-11-13 22:45:25 UTC

Can reproduce with 3.5.5: sort for anything but name and the entered keypresses will try to select the first matching item in the _sort_ column, not in the name column

Comment 9 Christian Muehlhaeuser 2008-01-13 22:57:43 UTC

ok, now i do understand how it's supposed to work (even tho i expected it to work differently). i guess i can accept that and i'll close the report as invalid therefore.