Summary: | ability to Change transparency/opacity of the desktop applets | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Plasma] plasma4 | Reporter: | Emil Sedgh <emilsedgh> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | bluedzins, dschaefer79 |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Compiled Sources | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Attachments: |
Aya theme: No Transparency, Ugly desktop.
Slim Glow Theme: beautiful transparency. The Mockup: a picture worths thousands words. |
Description
Emil Sedgh
2008-03-26 11:33:26 UTC
Created attachment 24062 [details]
Aya theme: No Transparency, Ugly desktop.
Created attachment 24063 [details]
Slim Glow Theme: beautiful transparency.
Created attachment 24064 [details]
The Mockup: a picture worths thousands words.
Yes, yes! Transparency should be configurable -- themes are too monolithic, either everything or nothing. Related report: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165795 (In reply to comment #5) > Related report: > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165795 > Isn't this rather a duplicate of the one you mentioned? I am not sure, because Aaron mentioned transparency in theme -- so it seems the other report is rather "one global option" oriented, this one is -- each element on its own. If this true, it is better to keep those reports separate, as now. (In reply to comment #7) I just suggested options implying separate settings for each plasmoid in the other report. Am I confusing things now...? Or is it really the same now? If we have code to control each plasmoid on it's own we could also do one for all. *** Bug 207844 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** There's no point in having this bug open. Developers are not interested in it and I dont think it would be a good idea anymore. |