Bug 88194 - Wish: Support ClearCase version management in Dolphin
Summary: Wish: Support ClearCase version management in Dolphin
Status: RESOLVED INTENTIONAL
Alias: None
Product: dolphin
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: 16.12.2
Platform: Gentoo Packages Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dolphin Bug Assignee
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-27 09:04 UTC by Mika Myllynen
Modified: 2018-07-14 20:47 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Mika Myllynen 2004-08-27 09:04:19 UTC
Version:           3.2.3 (using KDE KDE 3.2.3)
Installed from:    Gentoo Packages
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3.2 20031218 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.2-r5, propolice-3.3-7) 
OS:                Linux

ClearCase is a version management tool by Rational, used by many large corporations. Would be nice if Konqueror would support clearcase in file management mode, ie. one could do at least basic operations like checkin, checkout, setview etc. via context menus and the like. Currently I havent found even a way to view VOB (versioned object base, repository) contents. In dynamic mode ClearCase requires a view to be set for each shell-session. Setting view and getting access in konsole does not make the view visible in Konqueror.
Comment 1 Julian Steinmann 2018-04-02 12:21:51 UTC
ClearCase has practically been superseded by Git. We can of course still keep this issue open, but I don't think that this wish still has a high priority.
Comment 2 Julian Steinmann 2018-07-14 20:28:22 UTC
ClearCase does not seem to be used anymore apart from a very small portion of companies, which most likely don't use Dolphin. Because we haven't received an update or a wish to keep this report open, I'll close this request for now. In the  unlikely case that you do still need ClearCase support in Dolphin, please reopen this report, but be aware that you'll probably need to write the implementation yourself...