Bug 376869 - unhandled syscall: 531
Summary: unhandled syscall: 531
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG
Alias: None
Product: valgrind
Classification: Developer tools
Component: memcheck (show other bugs)
Version: 3.10.0
Platform: Other FreeBSD
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Julian Seward
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-02-24 02:10 UTC by benkasminbullock
Modified: 2017-02-24 09:52 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description benkasminbullock 2017-02-24 02:10:02 UTC
Version information is as follows:

==9740== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==9740== Copyright (C) 2002-2013, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==9740== Using Valgrind-3.10.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==9740== Command: /usr/home/ben/projects/kanjivg/t/../www/memory.cgi -q c=6BC5
==9740== 

Valgrind produced the following:

--9740-- WARNING: unhandled syscall: 531
--9740-- You may be able to write your own handler.
--9740-- Read the file README_MISSING_SYSCALL_OR_IOCTL.
--9740-- Nevertheless we consider this a bug.  Please report
--9740-- it at http://valgrind.org/support/bug_reports.html.

My OS is like this:

FreeBSD mikan 10.3-RELEASE-p11 FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p11 #0: Mon Oct 24 18:47:18 UTC 2016     root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

According to syscall.h, call 531 is

#define SYS_posix_fadvise       531

My package for valgrind is up to date:

# pkg upgrade valgrind
Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue...
FreeBSD repository is up-to-date.
All repositories are up-to-date.
Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
Your packages are up to date.
Comment 1 Tom Hughes 2017-02-24 07:12:56 UTC
The FreeBSD port of valgrind is a separate project that is not part of the upstream code base and is not maintained by us.

You will need to report this to the people that maintain the FreeBSD port.
Comment 2 Ivo Raisr 2017-02-24 07:34:59 UTC
That said, if the FreeBSD port is mature enough, its maintainers should initiate talks about integrating it upstream.
Comment 3 benkasminbullock 2017-02-24 09:52:54 UTC
Apparently this bug had already been reported:

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212697