Bug 269795 - nepomuk crash on boot on armel omap4 system
Summary: nepomuk crash on boot on armel omap4 system
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: nepomuk
Classification: Miscellaneous
Component: storage (show other bugs)
Version: 4.6
Platform: Ubuntu Linux
: NOR crash
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Sebastian Trueg
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-31 01:34 UTC by Tobin Davis
Modified: 2011-11-16 09:34 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tobin Davis 2011-03-31 01:34:58 UTC
Application: nepomukservicestub (0.2)
KDE Platform Version: 4.6.1 (4.6.1)
Qt Version: 4.7.2
Operating System: Linux 2.6.38-1207-omap4 armv7l
Distribution: Ubuntu Natty (development branch)

-- Information about the crash:
- What I was doing when the application crashed:

Booting a fresh install on armel omap4 pandaboard running Kubuntu Natty Beta 1

The crash can be reproduced every time.

-- Backtrace:
Application: Nepomuk Service Stub (nepomukservicestub), signal: Segmentation fault
[KCrash Handler]
#6  0x44710578 in operator int (this=0x1270b08) at /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qbasicatomic.h:85
#7  qt_metatype_id (this=0x1270b08) at ../../../backends/virtuoso/virtuosocontroller.cpp:43
#8  qt_metatype_id (this=0x1270b08) at /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qmetatype.h:169
#9  qMetaTypeId<QProcess::ExitStatus> (this=0x1270b08) at /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qmetatype.h:230
#10 qRegisterMetaType<QProcess::ExitStatus> (this=0x1270b08) at /usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qmetatype.h:243
#11 Soprano::VirtuosoController::VirtuosoController (this=0x1270b08) at ../../../backends/virtuoso/virtuosocontroller.cpp:83
#12 0x4470d578 in Soprano::Virtuoso::BackendPlugin::createModel (this=0x1267e08, settings=...) at ../../../backends/virtuoso/virtuosobackend.cpp:71
#13 0x42077370 in Nepomuk::Repository::open (this=0x126d880) at ../../../../nepomuk/services/storage/repository.cpp:158
#14 0x420784ec in Nepomuk::Repository::qt_metacall (this=0x126d880, _c=QMetaObject::InvokeMetaMethod, _id=-4, _a=0x12615d8) at ./repository.moc:83
#15 0x401d47a0 in QMetaObject::metacall (object=0x126d880, cl=<value optimized out>, idx=<value optimized out>, argv=<value optimized out>) at kernel/qmetaobject.cpp:237
#16 0x401ddeb8 in QObject::event (this=0x126d880, e=<value optimized out>) at kernel/qobject.cpp:1226
#17 0x40930170 in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper (this=<value optimized out>, receiver=0x126d880, e=0x1267570) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:4462
#18 0x40933198 in QApplication::notify (this=0xbe9f07d8, receiver=0x126d880, e=0x1267570) at kernel/qapplication.cpp:4341
#19 0x40643218 in KApplication::notify (this=0xbe9f07d8, receiver=0x126d880, event=0x1267570) at ../../kdeui/kernel/kapplication.cpp:311
#20 0x401d0792 in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal (this=<value optimized out>, receiver=<value optimized out>, event=0x1267570) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:731
#21 0x401d2cc4 in sendEvent (receiver=0x0, event_type=0, data=0x1187c78) at ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/kernel/qcoreapplication.h:215
#22 QCoreApplicationPrivate::sendPostedEvents (receiver=0x0, event_type=0, data=0x1187c78) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:1372
#23 0x401eda04 in sendPostedEvents (s=0x11ba578) at ../../include/QtCore/../../src/corelib/kernel/qcoreapplication.h:220
#24 postEventSourceDispatch (s=0x11ba578) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:277
#25 0x410837f6 in g_main_context_dispatch () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libglib-2.0.so.0
#26 0x41083d40 in ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libglib-2.0.so.0
#27 0x41083d40 in ?? () from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabi/libglib-2.0.so.0
Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)

Reported using DrKonqi
Comment 1 Sebastian Trueg 2011-11-01 14:23:22 UTC
Can this be reproduced with a newer version of KDE? Say 4.6.4 or even 4.7.2?
Comment 2 Vishesh Handa 2011-11-07 08:44:36 UTC
Changing status to 'Waiting For Info'
Comment 3 Tobin Davis 2011-11-07 16:06:50 UTC
This was fixed in Kubuntu Oneiric.  Sorry, I didn't have time to help work on debugging this.  My daily schedule was 110% consumed with Arm Server testing.  Testing Kubuntu is something I have been doing as a courtesy for Scott Kitterman on the side.  I will keep doing milestone testing until the KDE/Kubuntu community can purchase supported Arm hardware and take over full time.