Bug 159376 - Some functions present in Dictionary can't be used (e.g. arctanh). Console says they are unimplemented.
Summary: Some functions present in Dictionary can't be used (e.g. arctanh). Console ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: kalgebra
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR wishlist
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Aleix Pol
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-03-15 22:56 UTC by Joey Adams
Modified: 2008-09-27 15:57 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:

Attachments
Add an attachment

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Joey Adams 2008-03-15 22:56:09 UTC 
Version:           0.7 (using 4.00.00 (KDE 4.0.0), compiled sources)
Compiler:          gcc
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.24-2.fc9

KAlgebra 0.7 on Fedora 9 Alpha has unimplemented functions (such as arctanh) that are listed in the Dictionary but report as simply "WRONG" in the 2D graph window rather than saying that the function is unimplemented (one must type the expression in the console to find this out).  Perhaps "WRONG" should be replaced with more specific error messages such as "arctanh() not implemented" for this one and "Syntax error", "missing end )" for those respective errors.
Comment 1 Aleix Pol 2008-03-15 23:57:31 UTC 
SVN commit 786061 by apol:

Added a missing operation.
BUG: 159376


 M  +7 -6      operations.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=786061
Comment 2 Aleix Pol 2008-03-16 00:22:21 UTC 
SVN commit 786065 by apol:

Backport of the fix.
CCBUG: 159376


 M  +3 -1      analitza.cpp  


WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=786065
Comment 3 Creidieki M. Crouch 2008-04-03 16:23:01 UTC 
I think this bug should still be open.  The patch from Aleix Pol added one of the missing operations, but we are still missing arccsc, arccsch, arcsec, arcsech, arcsinh, arctanh.
Comment 4 Aleix Pol 2008-04-03 16:28:37 UTC 
Yes you are right, I'm reopening the bug.
Comment 5 Aleix Pol 2008-09-27 15:57:45 UTC 
It is finally working now, there is the OperatorsModelTest which is checking this won't happen anymore ;).