Bug 158398 - Olympus raw images shown with wrong orientation
Summary: Olympus raw images shown with wrong orientation
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: digikam
Classification: Applications
Component: Metadata-Raw (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: Gentoo Packages Linux
: NOR normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Digikam Developers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-02-25 15:52 UTC by Johannes Wienke
Modified: 2017-08-10 19:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In: 0.9.4


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Johannes Wienke 2008-02-25 15:52:48 UTC
Version:            (using KDE 3.5.8)
Installed from:    Gentoo Packages

Since digikam is able to read Olympus orf images I've noticed a bug concerning the orientation of the displayed images.
I'm using exiv2-0.1.6 so exif information of orf-images from my Olympus E-510 are processed correctly by ufraw. This also means that digikams exif browser displays an orientation for all my raw images and in the thumbnail preview all images are rotated correctly. Nevertheless, if I display one of the portrait images (using F3), digikam doesn't rotate the image. This happens for both possible values of the orientation exif field my camera generates: right - top and left - bottom.
Comment 1 caulier.gilles 2008-03-18 14:22:04 UTC
Johannes,

This is releavant of Exiv2. ORF is fully supported with last Exiv2 0.16 release.

Please update Exiv2, libkexiv2 and digiKam and try again...

Andreas, I just CC you for information...

Gilles Caulier
Comment 2 Johannes Wienke 2008-03-18 17:28:38 UTC
I think I'm using the recent Exiv2 release 0.16, libkexiv2-0.1.6 and digikam 0.9.2. Or do I get those abilities only from trunk versions?
Comment 3 caulier.gilles 2008-03-18 17:45:35 UTC
No, trunk do give more improvement for that, but at least using last stable 0.9.3 can be fine...

Gilles Caulier
Comment 4 caulier.gilles 2008-03-18 17:49:59 UTC
Sorry, trunk do _not_ give improvements i want mean (:=)))

Gilles Caulier
Comment 5 Johannes Wienke 2008-03-18 18:21:56 UTC
Works with digikam 0.9.3. Thanks. :)