Bug 111225 - DCC downloads not work when using a XDCC server and files is sort by packs [fwd from Debian user]
Summary: DCC downloads not work when using a XDCC server and files is sort by packs [...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: konversation
Classification: Applications
Component: general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Platform: unspecified Linux
: NOR normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Shintaro Matsuoka
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-21 17:36 UTC by Nathaniel W. Turner
Modified: 2006-10-21 13:24 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Latest Commit:
Version Fixed In:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nathaniel W. Turner 2005-08-21 17:38:07 UTC
Version:           0.19 #3031 (using KDE 3.4.1, Debian Package 4:3.4.1-1 (3.1))
Compiler:          gcc version 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-5)
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.6.12-1-k7

A Debian user reports [1] a bug with XDCC, quoted below:

----
Using a whole set of XDCC servers all work correctly when the files is NOT 
sorted by packs, ie:

/ctcp USER xdcc send #1 <--- Download the file #1 correctly, but if is 
sorted in one pack:

/ctcp USER xdcc send pack_of_files #1 <--- Download the file #1 of 
pack_of_files, konversation fails ("Error of connection, can't download file" 
and server IP is ¿0.0.0.0?.

Using another's irc-clients like irssi or xchat, the download of files-on-packs 
from xdcc servers work correctly...
----

[1] Full original bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323508

XDCC is something I don't know much about, so I'm not likely to be much help, but if there is something I can do to help troubleshoot this, please let me know.
Comment 1 Eike Hein 2006-10-21 13:24:09 UTC
I'm closing this as WORKSFORME, since I've used the above syntax to request files from a bot with 1.0.1 lately, and had no apparent issues.
Comment 2 Eike Hein 2006-10-21 13:24:43 UTC
(Addendum: The original bug in the Debian tracker was reported against 0.17, so that was quite a while ago.)