| Summary: | Deleting a class that contains another class leaves the model inconsistent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] umbrello | Reporter: | Marcos Mayorga <drmay_en> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Umbrello Development Group <umbrello-devel> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Debian testing | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Marcos Mayorga
2004-12-16 11:17:08 UTC
If you save and load the file the sub-class disappears from any diagrams it is in. Marcos Mayorga wrote:
>
> The expected behaviour is that class 'b' should now belong
> to the closest package in the hierarchy.
Really? That seems counterintuitive. When deleting a folder
or directory, usually all the contents disappear too.
Yes, but when speaking about classes I rather see the deletion in cascade could result in the loose of useful work, because when a class 'belongs' to another, it means it in terms of scope or visibility, and not in terms of functionality.
example:
class line {
class point{};
};
If I decide not to use lines but it is better to use polylines, in the model I don't want point to dissapear, because I'm going to need it in my new polyline class
CVS commit by okellogg: On deleting a package (or class) in the list view, move contained objects outside. BUG:95252 M +4 -2 ChangeLog 1.47 M +48 -36 umbrello/umllistview.cpp 1.133 M +5 -5 umbrello/umllistview.h 1.52 |