Summary: | Sort on date should look at the date the picture is taken | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Tom Albers <toma> |
Component: | Albums-ItemsSort | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | sebastian, topace |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 0.7.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | unspecified | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Tom Albers
2004-08-22 20:15:26 UTC
*** Bug 91563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 93468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I think images should be sorted on the image creation date from the EXIF header. When you copy images under linux, the default behaviour is to alter the file timestamp to the current time... so when sorting on the file timestamp gets seriously screwed after copying images... This is implemented in the experimental branch, which will be distributed eventually as digiKam 0.8. Don't hold your breaths untill that one is released, but it will arrive. ah nice .... *waiting for 0.8* I just wanted to report a bug about that.. but maybe add more than just exif date sorting, maybe for any exif info there is ? So you can find, for example your long time exposures, easily, and so on That will not be for 0.8, but is of course on the todo list. Could you also make the date to sort for selectable by user? I took a few photos today in RAW format this afternoon and converted them to jpg later this evening. Now the RAW converter adds a modification time to the EXIF header. When importing them into digikam the filename is generated from the last modification time found in EXIF, and this determines the sort order too. As I didnĀ“t convert the files in the order they were taken they appear in random order now. It would be great if digikam lets the user select this. Sebastian |