| Summary: | kstart can make a window show up on the wrong desktop | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Unmaintained] kstart | Reporter: | Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Lubos Lunak <l.lunak> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Debian testing | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Kjetil Kjernsmo
2004-05-14 16:51:53 UTC
No, in fact it's not recommended to omit the --window option, and that's why you have the problem. Huh?
But I mean, the docs say:
--window <regexp> A regular expression matching the window title.
If you do not specify one, then the very first window
to appear will be taken. NOT RECOMMENDED!
I'm not a native English speaker (but I guess I'm representative for a sizeable audience), but as far as I can see, it can't be interpreted any other way that one is strongly discouraged from using the --window option...
Now, AFAICS (still not native English), the "NOT RECOMMENDED" sentence doesn't really parse... :-) It lacks a subject, i.e. it doesn't answer the question "what is not recommended?" If it isn't recommended to omit it, it should say that: "This option is strongly recommended" would be a lot clearer.
I hope you can clarify.
Should this be in a separate bug?
I read it as "--window option is this and that. If you don't specify it, it'll do that. It's not recommended not to specify it", but you're probably right about it being a bit unclear, I'll change it. |