Bug 70678

Summary: IDEAL mode frame width acts wierd
Product: [Applications] kdevelop Reporter: Simon Ejsing <simon>
Component: UI: IDEAlAssignee: KDevelop Developers <kdevelop-devel>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED    
Severity: normal CC: bigbob, gareth
Priority: NOR    
Version First Reported In: git master   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Gentoo Packages   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments: Snapshot of watch tab
Snapshot of File selector tab
Snapshot of wierd acting IDEAL

Description Simon Ejsing 2003-12-17 13:14:08 UTC 
Version:           CVS version of today (using KDE KDE 3.1.4)
Installed from:    Gentoo Packages
Compiler:          gcc 3.2.3 
OS:          Linux

The width of the tabs of the IDEAL display mode are not saved on close, which results in mine having strange widths. When opening a project and then selecting the tabs to the left, the watch window have the propper width, while the file selector is very small.

After resizing just one of the tabs, all tabs return to that size. However this is not saved, so reopening the project makes the tabs act wierd again.

I have to resize the tabs everytime I reopen a project. I first thought that this problem was related to old project files, however it does the same for new projects created with this version.

I have two screen shots available showing the different tabs width.
Comment 1 Simon Ejsing 2003-12-17 13:25:38 UTC 
Created attachment 3745 [details]
Snapshot of watch tab
Comment 2 Simon Ejsing 2003-12-17 13:26:01 UTC 
Created attachment 3746 [details]
Snapshot of File selector tab
Comment 3 Konrad Klimaszewski 2003-12-17 22:13:38 UTC 
I've also encountered this bug.
Additionaly field containing tabs gets wider and wider when I close and then open project. Screen shot follows.
Comment 4 Konrad Klimaszewski 2003-12-17 22:16:24 UTC 
Created attachment 3757 [details]
Snapshot of wierd acting IDEAL
Comment 5 Konrad Klimaszewski 2003-12-17 22:18:03 UTC 
I forgot to metion that opening any tab window resizes those fields corectly :)
Comment 6 Amilcar do Carmo Lucas 2004-01-06 17:55:48 UTC 
This is related to BR70037
Comment 7 Amilcar do Carmo Lucas 2004-01-09 22:03:18 UTC 
*** Bug 72265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Jens Dagerbo 2004-04-17 04:57:43 UTC 
*** Bug 70037 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Jens Dagerbo 2004-05-14 21:46:10 UTC 
I believe this is solved.