Bug 61937

Summary:	Page objects not adjusting for scrollbar
Product:	[Applications] konqueror	Reporter:	metrol
Component:	khtml	Assignee:	Konqueror Bugs <konqueror-bugs-null>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	normal
Priority:	NOR
Version First Reported In:	4.0
Target Milestone:	---
Platform:	Compiled Sources
OS:	FreeBSD
Latest Commit:		Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments:	Test Case

Description metrol 2003-08-01 03:55:57 UTC

Version:           4.0 (using KDE 3.1.3)
Installed from:    compiled sources
Compiler:          gcc version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD]
OS:          FreeBSD (i386) release 4.8-STABLE

There seems to be a number of bugs reported that almost cover this subject.  Hopefully this is a better description of what all is going on.

For the sake of description let's say you have a table set to 100% width.  If its height is less than the window, thus not needing a vertical scroll, it appears as expected.

Now stack a number of such tables on top of eachother so that a vertical scrollbar is needed.  This takes additional space on the page which should force a resize of the table.  Instead, the interface keeps the table at the full width of the window and provides a horizontal scrollbar.

Any object requesting 100% width needs to take into account whether or not the vertical scrollbar is active and adjust accordingly.

Similar Bugs:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36069
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44611
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54736

I believe that correction of this bug will also correct these other buggies.

Comment 1 Maksim Orlovich 2003-08-01 04:02:43 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 61730 ***

Comment 2 Karl Vogel 2003-11-28 15:06:51 UTC

Created attachment 3459 [details]
Test Case

Example of problem with table width handling when DIV height is smaller than
table height (vertical scrollbar).

Comment 3 Karl Vogel 2003-11-28 15:10:31 UTC

Oops didn't see this was marked as a duplicate. Anyway I am still having this with KDE 3.1.93 (beta1). Maybe somebody can verify that the attachment is rendered correctly on CVS HEAD (beta2) and update the bug status accordingly.. or do I need to create a new bug?!

Comment 4 Karl Vogel 2003-11-30 19:43:28 UTC

Problem is still present with 3.1.94 (beta2). (nov 30 built)