Bug 60881

Summary: wish: to have actions for marked messages
Product: [Applications] kmail Reporter: Dmitri Drozdov <ddv>
Component: generalAssignee: kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: wishlist CC: bjoern
Priority: NOR    
Version: 1.5.1   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Compiled Sources   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:

Description Dmitri Drozdov 2003-07-07 16:47:14 UTC
Version:           1.5.1 (using KDE KDE 3.1.1a)
Installed from:    Compiled From Sources
Compiler:          gcc 
OS:          Linux

It'l be very helpful to have passibility to do thomething with marked messages, for example to move them into specified folder or so on. IMHO action list is sufficient, but selection conditions may be enchanced by ability "marked by" for "message" list item.
Comment 1 Ingo Klöcker 2003-07-07 17:26:38 UTC
If I understand correctly, you want to be able to apply self defined actions (similar to the filter 
actions) to selected messages. This will be possible in KDE 3.2. 
 
I don't understand what you mean with <quote>but selection conditions may be enchanced by 
ability "marked by" for "message" list item</quote> 
Comment 2 Dmitri Drozdov 2003-07-07 17:50:06 UTC
Subject: Re:  wish: to have actions for marked messages

7 July 2003 19:26, you write:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60881
>
> ------- Additional Comments From kloecker@kde.org  2003-07-07 17:26
> ------- If I understand correctly, you want to be able to apply self
> defined actions (similar to the filter actions) to selected messages.
> This will be possible in KDE 3.2.
>
> I don't understand what you mean with <quote>but selection conditions may
> be enchanced by ability "marked by" for "message" list item</quote>

I wish to apply some action from today's list to marked messages, may be 
confirmed some other criterias. For exampe, I want to delete only NOT 
marked messages after some days from income. Is explanation correct?

Regards,
Dmitri 

Comment 3 Björn Ruberg 2009-12-18 18:12:09 UTC
Well, not too obvious, but this is actually a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 35769 ***