Bug 59049

I believe that this has been fixed. You can now choose to set the get/set accessor method scope (visibility) according to a fixed choice, or the parent attribute/role visibility.

fixed by Brian Thomas some time ago

If it is possible to differentiate the accessor method scope from the attribute scope, I don't see a way to indicate this in the interface.

To be truly useful for Java code generation, here are the rules:

- if scope is private, create a private field with *no* accessors.
- if scope is public, create a *private* field with *public*-scope accessors.

// Fields
  private int myPrivateAttribute;
  private int myPublicAttribute;

...

// Accessor methods

// There should be no accessors for myPrivateAttribute!

  /**
   * Set the value of myPublicAttribute
   * @param newVar the new value of myPublicAttribute
   */
  private void setMyPublicAttribute ( int newVar ) {
    myPublicAttribute = newVar;
  }

  /**
   * Get the value of myPublicAttribute
   * @return the value of myPublicAttribute
   */
  private int getMyPublicAttribute ( ) {
    return myPublicAttribute;
  }

Aargh! now my comments have the bug:

accessors should be:

  /** 
    * Set the value of myPublicAttribute 
    * @param newVar the new value of myPublicAttribute 
    */ 
   public void setMyPublicAttribute ( int newVar ) { 
     myPublicAttribute = newVar; 
   } 
 
   /** 
    * Get the value of myPublicAttribute 
    * @return the value of myPublicAttribute 
    */ 
   public int getMyPublicAttribute ( ) { 
     return myPublicAttribute; 
   }