| Summary: | Reverse Autohide for Panels | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Plasma] plasmashell | Reporter: | jan.jr03+kde |
| Component: | Panel | Assignee: | Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | nate, niccolo.venerandi |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | master | ||
| Target Milestone: | 1.0 | ||
| Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
jan.jr03+kde
2026-01-05 22:13:54 UTC
The visibility mode you're suggesting sounds so specific to your setup that I doubt it makes sense to consider more generally. In addition, as requested, hiding when the pointer comes close would make it impossible to interact with anything on the panel, or indeed even to configure or remove it!
However…
> But when I choose "Windows go below", it blocks the Buttons beneath it.
Let's drill into this. Can you move the panel to a location where it's not blocking anything important?
I would need it at the Top Right still. But if there is a way top move it just so that the Window Decoration buttons are visible, that would also work for me. Since I can't edit my last comment: If there is a Way to do it with KWin Scripts I would also be happy. I know of a script that worked in Plasma 5 but I am not sure where to start to Port it or if it even is possible in Plasma 6. Maybe if you centered the panel rather than having it top-aligned, that would work? I actually have a fairly similar panel arrangement on my dual-monitor setup, and on the secondary monitor the large panel is centered vertically on the right screen edge so it doesn't cover up the titlebar buttons. I had the same idea. Unfortunately with centered on the right its over some other Stuff and when its centered at the top, its to far out of my sight to be useful again in my case. Then I guess you're stuck, sorry. There may be some scripting that can do what you want, but I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with it to provide any guidance. (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #6) > Then I guess you're stuck, sorry. There may be some scripting that can do > what you want, but I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with it to provide any > guidance. Thanks anyway. |