Bug 513359

Summary: application ram usage statistics not include TransparentHugePages
Product: [Applications] plasma-systemmonitor Reporter: qbit <15867107101>
Component: generalAssignee: KSysGuard Developers <ksysguard-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED NOT A BUG    
Severity: normal CC: ahiemstra, kde, plasma-bugs-null
Priority: NOR    
Version First Reported In: 6.5.80   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Other   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments: attachment-1096434-0.html

Description qbit 2025-12-14 13:26:47 UTC 
Operating System: Arch Linux 
KDE Plasma Version: 6.5.4
KDE Frameworks Version: 6.20.0
Qt Version: 6.10.1
Kernel Version: 6.17.9-zen1-1-zen (64-bit)
Graphics Platform: Wayland
Processors: 16 × AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with Radeon Graphics
Memory: 64 GiB of RAM (61.6 GiB usable)
Graphics Processor: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

task manager ram "application usage" statistics is not correct, when using TransparentHugePages.

like this (file attached).
Comment 1 David Edmundson 2025-12-14 23:03:40 UTC 
There can never be a single value of RAM that is correct, it's a complex topic.

>like this (file attached).
There is nothing attached.
Comment 2 qbit 2025-12-15 00:19:31 UTC 
Created attachment 187645 [details]
attachment-1096434-0.html

Okay,you are right,htop also provided a wrong statistic,seemd Hugepage using file cache.

Please ignore this bug repo.



---- Replied Message ----
| From | David Edmundson<bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> |
| Date | 12/15/2025 07:03 |
| To | 15867107101@163.com |
| Cc | |
| Subject | [plasma-systemmonitor] [Bug 513359] application ram usage statistics not include TransparentHugePages |
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=513359

David Edmundson <kde@davidedmundson.co.uk> changed:

          What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Status|REPORTED                    |NEEDSINFO
        Resolution|---                         |WAITINGFORINFO
                CC|                            |kde@davidedmundson.co.uk

--- Comment #1 from David Edmundson <kde@davidedmundson.co.uk> ---
There can never be a single value of RAM that is correct, it's a complex topic.

>like this (file attached).
There is nothing attached.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You reported the bug.