| Summary: | Excessive padding on the left of context menu items | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Plasma] Breeze | Reporter: | Damglador <vse.stopchanskyi> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | 4wy78uwh, kde, uhhadd |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 6.5.3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: | Example | ||
|
Description
Damglador
2025-11-25 22:05:18 UTC
I agree. This, coincided with reduced padding between the icons and their text, makes what once seemed balanced (and was much closer to balanced, on all sides) appear uniquely difficult to parse. I'll note that I don't observe this arrangement on any other DEs and OSes; instead, they all attempt to imitate < 6.5.3. For anyone unfamiliar with this topic, see https://www.reddit.com/r/kde/comments/1p3jacn/comment/nqs2ja0/. The new version looks better and is more consistent with other menus. Whilst I understand that change looks odd at first there is a cost to having options and at the end of the day no-one spends that long looking at menus. Then other menus should be changed as well. These menus are everywhere, not looking at them is impossible. It looks too big even compared to padding on the right, if looking at the arrows (if present), with ~14 pixels from the edge, compared to ~18 pixels on the left. (In reply to David Edmundson from comment #2) > The new version looks better and is more consistent with other menus. Can you really close it with “looks better” when others clearly disagree? I don't know how to empirically determine which is superior, but I know that that kind of dismissal doesn't assist much. We're all for consistency. That does not mean that we all want the design decisions present in Kirigami's QQuickStyle to be authoritative, especially over the long-beautiful QWidgets QStyle. > Whilst I understand that change looks odd at first there is a cost to having > options and at the end of the day no-one spends that long looking at menus. That's not a reason not to improve something, else this change wouldn't have occurred. |