Bug 512501

Summary: Qt6 upgrade to 6.10.1 breaks Plasma
Product: [Plasma] plasmashell Reporter: Clodoaldo <clodoaldo.pinto.neto>
Component: generic-crashAssignee: Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs-null>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal CC: ilikefoss
Priority: NOR    
Version First Reported In: 6.5.3   
Target Milestone: 1.0   
Platform: Other   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed/Implemented In:
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments: Developer information from plasma shell crash handler

Description Clodoaldo 2025-11-23 10:42:22 UTC
Created attachment 187088 [details]
Developer information from plasma shell crash handler

```
Operating System: Fedora Linux 43
KDE Plasma Version: 6.5.3
KDE Frameworks Version: 6.20.0
Qt Version: 6.10.1
Kernel Version: 6.17.8-300.fc43.x86_64 (64-bit)
Graphics Platform: Wayland
Processors: 16 × AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core Processor
Memory: 32 GiB of RAM (31,2 GiB usable)
Graphics Processor: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Manufacturer: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
Product Name: B550M DS3H
```
After today's Fedora 43 `qt6` upgrade  from 6.10.0 to 6.10.1 plasma crashes everytime at startup and does not recover.

Trying to revert the dnf transaction fails with the attached output.

And trying to downgrade qt6 also does not work:
```
# dnf downgrade qt6\*
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem: problem with installed package
  - installed package knighttime-6.5.3-1.fc43.x86_64 requires libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6.10)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package knighttime-6.5.3-1.fc43.x86_64 from updates requires libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6.10)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both qt6-qtbase-6.9.2-1.fc43.x86_64 from fedora and qt6-qtbase-6.10.1-1.fc43.x86_64 from @System
  - cannot install both qt6-qtbase-6.10.1-1.fc43.x86_64 from updates and qt6-qtbase-6.9.2-1.fc43.x86_64 from fedora
  - conflicting requests
You can try to add to command line:
  --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages
```
Comment 1 Antonio Rojas 2025-11-23 10:43:47 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 512500 ***