| Summary: | Custom Tiling bypasses minimum window size restrictions, causing visual breakage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Plasma] kwin | Reporter: | Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell <4wy78uwh> |
| Component: | Custom Tiling | Assignee: | KWin default assignee <kwin-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | minor | CC: | akselmo, notmart |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 6.4.5 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Fedora RPMs | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: |
A Demonstrative Screenshot Of System Settings
A 2nd Demonstrative Screenshot Of System Settings A Demonstrative Screenshot Of Spectacle A Demonstrative Screenshot Of Filelight |
||
|
Description
Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell
2025-09-30 00:29:29 UTC
Created attachment 185380 [details]
A 2nd Demonstrative Screenshot Of System Settings
Created attachment 185381 [details]
A Demonstrative Screenshot Of Spectacle
Created attachment 185382 [details]
A Demonstrative Screenshot Of Filelight
Can confirm, however I'm not sure if this is an issue or if it's intentional: You can also break some apps with window rules, which is what these tiles basically are. Will set this as resolved - intentional for now, unless someone who knows more about this feature can confirm it's an actual bug. Operating System: Fedora Linux 42 KDE Plasma Version: 6.5.80 KDE Frameworks Version: 6.19.0 Qt Version: 6.9.2 Kernel Version: 6.16.8-200.fc42.x86_64 (64-bit) Graphics Platform: Wayland Processors: 12 × AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor Memory: 16 GiB of RAM (15.5 GiB usable) Graphics Processor: AMD Radeon RX 6600 (In reply to Akseli Lahtinen from comment #4) Thanks! That's my impression, and having it codified is of use. This should force some more adaptive UIs. However, I presume that that also means that when an application breaks because it's too small, you shan't accept a bug about it? Or might you, if it's Kirigami-based (like FileLight is)? (In reply to Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell from comment #5) > (In reply to Akseli Lahtinen from comment #4) > > Thanks! That's my impression, and having it codified is of use. This should > force some more adaptive UIs. However, I presume that that also means that > when an application breaks because it's too small, you shan't accept a bug > about it? Or might you, if it's Kirigami-based (like FileLight is)? I'd say it's very application dependent. So feel free to make bugreports, the maintainers will decide how to go on from there. |