| Summary: | improper processing of multiple vevent per vcalendar | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Frameworks and Libraries] Akonadi | Reporter: | Christof Schulze <christof.schulze> |
| Component: | DAV Resource | Assignee: | kdepim bugs <pim-bugs-null> |
| Status: | REPORTED --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | carl |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: |
working.ics as referenced in the description. This validates using https://icalendar.org/validator.html#l1
broken.ics as per description. This is wht is visible in akonadiconsole as RAW Payload |
||
|
Description
Christof Schulze
2025-08-24 23:18:03 UTC
Created attachment 184417 [details]
broken.ics as per description. This is wht is visible in akonadiconsole as RAW Payload
I was struggling a bit with the form, therefore the report is a bit untidy. Is there a way I can edit? If not, should I send a different, cleaned-up version? the original vcalender contains multiple vevent entries, all with the same UUID and each of those referencing a different recurrence ID which then has deviating DTSTART and DTEND defined that describe the exception for this recurrence. It seems, akonadi is not parsing that correctly. |