| Summary: | Not detecting rotated (on an angle) face | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Craig <craigfryer.au> |
| Component: | Faces-Detection | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | REPORTED --- | ||
| Severity: | minor | CC: | caulier.gilles, michael_miller |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 8.6.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Microsoft Windows | ||
| OS: | Microsoft Windows | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Craig
2025-03-27 02:48:18 UTC
Your sentences are ambiguous in your report. Title said "detection", and explaination uses "recognitions". Both are 2 separated process in digiKam. Which one is affected by this regression ? Hi Craig, Please let me know if I understand this correctly. When the face is rotated in the image the face engine isn't detecting the face in the image. When you crop the face into its own image and then rotate the cropped image, then digiKam is detecting the face in the image. Is that correct? Cheers, Mike (In reply to Michael Miller from comment #2) > Hi Craig, > Please let me know if I understand this correctly. > > When the face is rotated in the image the face engine isn't detecting the > face in the image. When you crop the face into its own image and then > rotate the cropped image, then digiKam is detecting the face in the image. > > Is that correct? > > Cheers, > Mike Yes. Apologies for misusing the "recognising" term. I should have used "detected". > Yes. Apologies for misusing the "recognising" term. I should have used > "detected". Hi Craig, Can you send me a copy of the image? My email can be found here: https://invent.kde.org/graphics/digikam/-/blob/master/AUTHORS Cheers, Mike Hi, The 8.7.0 pre-release Windows installer from today have been rebuilt from scratch with Qt 6.8.3, KDE 6.12, OpenCV 4.11 + CUDA support, Exiv2 0.28.5, ExifTool 13.27, ffmpeg 7, all image codecs updated to last version (jxl, avif, heif, aom, etc.). Please try with this version to see if your problem still reproducible... https://files.kde.org/digikam/ Thanks in advance Best regards Gilles Caulier |