| Summary: | `plasmawindowed` does not pad window decorations, for me. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Plasma] Plasma SDK | Reporter: | Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell <4wy78uwh> |
| Component: | plasmoidviewer | Assignee: | Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | minor | CC: | cwo.kde, giorgos.tsiapaliokas, nate |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 6.2.5 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Fedora RPMs | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | https://discuss.kde.org/t/this-week-in-plasma-fancy-time-zone-picker-kde-blogs/28753/15?u=rokejulianlockhart#:~:text=although%20the%20padding%E2%80%99s%20gone%2C%20weirdly,Screenshot_20250125_161918 | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499872 | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: |
Screenshot of mine in 6.2.5 (for `#c0`).
Screenshot of another's in 6.3.80 (for `#c0`). An updateable report to replace `#c0`. Screenshot of mine in 6.3.0 (for `#c6`). |
||
|
Description
Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell
2025-01-26 11:15:43 UTC
Created attachment 177690 [details] Screenshot of another's in 6.3.80 (for `#c0`). (In reply to Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell from comment #0) > Another user explains at https://discuss.kde.org/t/this-week-in-plasma-fancy-time-zone-picker-kde-blogs/28753/20?u=rokejulianlockhart that their installation does pad the windows correctly, and has provided visual evidence of it. > > I shall attach it after this has been filed, since I want to attach the erroneous one first. (In reply to Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell from comment #0) > OBSERVED RESULT > --------------- > > It's not padded, as [this screenshot of mine](https://discuss-cdn.kde.org/uploads/default/original/3X/a/e/aef1e54d7593878f1d350218229b072d268b85d7.png) depicts. > > EXPECTED RESULT > --------------- > > It should be padded, as [this screenshot from another user](https://discuss-cdn.kde.org/uploads/default/original/3X/3/4/347154b29d4ca8cde175037aaffa42c3b540f9fb.png) depicts. Apologies, for I forget that format doesn't work well in Bugzilla. I should have used substitution syntax: ~~~Markdown OBSERVED RESULT --------------- It's not padded, as [this screenshot of mine][1] depicts. [1]: https://discuss-cdn.kde.org/uploads/default/original/3X/a/e/aef1e54d7593878f1d350218229b072d268b85d7.png EXPECTED RESULT --------------- It should be padded, as [this screenshot from another user][2] depicts. [2]: https://discuss-cdn.kde.org/uploads/default/original/3X/3/4/347154b29d4ca8cde175037aaffa42c3b540f9fb.png ~~~ Created attachment 177691 [details] An updateable report to replace `#c0`. (In reply to Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell from comment #2) I'll just update a file. No need to publish updates here. Collapse them, if desirable. I can reproduce this on stock Fedora 41 and stock Tuxedo OS. I can't reproduce this on master (as the screenshot shows). I suspect that this is an issue that was fixed somewhere along the way. I don't see anything obvious in the plasmoidviewer commits that could be related to this, so possibly something in a library. Qt version is the same, so that shouldn't be it. Plasma 6.3 is right around the corner, so we can test the distro versions then. I'm setting this to NEEDSINFO until then; the 14-day reminder email should come right around the 6.3 release so exactly when we can check it. 🐛🧹 ⚠️ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug status to REPORTED. If there is no change for at least 30 days, it will be automatically closed as RESOLVED WORKSFORME. For more information about our bug triaging procedures, please read https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging. Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone! Created attachment 178175 [details] Screenshot of mine in 6.3.0 (for `#c6`). (In reply to Bug Janitor Service from comment #5) Good timing! I got the 6.3 update a few minutes ago. It's indeed remediated in 6.3. I was just about to go test this, thanks for taking care of it! Marking as resolved. (In reply to cwo from comment #7) Though, does it look to you like the toolbar buttons are correctly padded? To me, it looks like the right-most one overlaps with the window border. (In reply to Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell from comment #8) > To me, it looks like the right-most one overlaps with the window border. It goes right up to the window border. It probably shouldn't do that and have a smallSpacing instead. But I guess that's a different issue. (In reply to cwo from comment #9) ...I'll file *that*, too, then. Thanks. |
