Summary: | Tuncate files names in the middle | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] dolphin | Reporter: | Maximilian Böhm <mabo> |
Component: | view-engine: details mode | Assignee: | Dolphin Bug Assignee <dolphin-bugs-null> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | akselmo, felixernst, kfm-devel, mabo, meven, nate |
Priority: | NOR | Keywords: | usability |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Maximilian Böhm
2024-12-18 23:15:49 UTC
Dolphin currently elides at the end of the file name, but before the extension, so that part never gets cut off. IIRC there was quite a lot of discussion in the recent past that resulted in this implementation. However I can see from the image posted at that link that our current implementation would hide any information the user has added as an explicit suffix though, such as a year, an ordinal number, etc. Perhaps it would indeed be wiser to go for the simple option of eliding in the middle. I agree that truncating in the middle is somewhat sensible. That being said, we can't really win here because it will always be mostly about assumptions which part of a file name string is the most important for the user to see and there will always be examples where we are doing the wrong thing. The wanted behaviour might also vary by culture and language e.g. because in some regions it might be normal to typically frontload information or something. I'll set this as CONFIRMED for now because I would not mind if anyone worked on this, however I would like whoever works on this to first search up on the previous discussion on this topic that Nate mentioned and explain why those discussions resulted in a sub-optimal solution. |