Bug 493554

Summary: Icons move AFTER being Locked.
Product: [Plasma] plasmashell Reporter: John A. Ward <john>
Component: Desktop icons & Folder View widgetAssignee: Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs-null>
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME    
Severity: normal CC: hein, nate
Priority: NOR    
Version First Reported In: 6.2.3   
Target Milestone: 1.0   
Platform: Fedora RPMs   
OS: Linux   
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments: main screen
showing icons moving

Description John A. Ward 2024-09-23 23:50:28 UTC
Created attachment 174006 [details]
main screen

SUMMARY
I have my application on Fedora 39 and all is well, moved to Fedora 40 and icons move after being arranged and 'locked'.
My application uses 4x icons that need to be in a specific order.  After arranging the icons, I lock them and continue testing the system, my system is up-to-date with Fedora dnf update.  I am using the x11 windows, since the Wayland system doesn't emulate x11 well enough.  I use kde - vnc for my application.

If I setup the system all is good, then the next day SOME of the icons move, the Day AFTER more move and finally all have moved back into alpha order, which renders the system unuseable to me AND my clients.
Thank you in advance.  Joh
I have done the Waayland-x11 update already 


STEPS TO REPRODUCE
1. Set up Icons
2. lock the screen
3. 

OBSERVED RESULT
The Icons move into alpha order.

EXPECTED RESULT
Icons need to stay in order.


SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Windows: 
macOS: 
(available in the Info Center app, or by running `kinfo` in a terminal window)
Linux/KDE Plasma: F40
KDE Plasma Version: 5.27
KDE Frameworks Version: 
Qt Version: 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Comment 1 John A. Ward 2024-09-23 23:55:36 UTC
Created attachment 174007 [details]
showing icons moving

Screens before, and at next day, and next day
Comment 2 Nate Graham 2024-09-24 03:34:05 UTC
How did you manage to get Plasma 5.27 on Fedora KDE 40?
Comment 3 John A. Ward 2024-09-30 20:10:53 UTC
Do you need any further information, why anyone would mandate a move to Wayland when it doesn't work is beyond me.
Comment 4 Nate Graham 2024-09-30 20:40:02 UTC
I'm asking about the process by which you accomplished this, because to my knowledge Fedora 40 doesn't support Plasma 5.27. If I'm correct and you managed to force it in there through extraordinary means, then I'm afraid KDE won't be able to offer support, because iIt becomes quite possible that any weird random issues you're seeing are the result of components that were not designed to work together being forced to anyway. In this case, you become the system integrator, and responsibility for debugging issues falls on your own shoulders.
Comment 5 John A. Ward 2024-10-01 19:03:13 UTC
Mr. Graham,

I did the upgrade from the Fedora site from Fedora 39 to Fedora 40, so I got whatever Red Hat - Fedora is distributing.  What should I do to make the system supportable?  I did what I normally do to upgrade to the latest release.  I would appreciate your comments on this method of upgrading and suggestions for what I should try.

There are Wayland-X11 patches that Fedora distributes to make systems still work after the upgrade. 

I still don't understand how a major factor in Linux, such as KDE can embrace MAJOR changes to the system that Break working Systems, your comments are welcome.

Thank you for your comments so far.
John A. Ward

> On 09/30/2024 4:40 PM EDT Nate Graham <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote:
> 
>  
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
> 
> --- Comment #4 from Nate Graham <nate@kde.org> ---
> I'm asking about the process by which you accomplished this, because to my
> knowledge Fedora 40 doesn't support Plasma 5.27. If I'm correct and you managed
> to force it in there through extraordinary means, then I'm afraid KDE won't be
> able to offer support, because iIt becomes quite possible that any weird random
> issues you're seeing are the result of components that were not designed to
> work together being forced to anyway. In this case, you become the system
> integrator, and responsibility for debugging issues falls on your own
> shoulders.
> 
> -- 
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.
Comment 6 John A. Ward 2024-10-02 18:34:03 UTC
Mr. Graham,

I didn't mention that I used the DNF method, somebody should look into that. It sounds like DNF didn't replace KDE with the new version?

John

> On 10/01/2024 3:03 PM EDT John A. Ward <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote:
> 
>  
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
> 
> --- Comment #5 from John A. Ward <john@mbstemps.com> ---
> Mr. Graham,
> 
> I did the upgrade from the Fedora site from Fedora 39 to Fedora 40, so I got
> whatever Red Hat - Fedora is distributing.  What should I do to make the system
> supportable?  I did what I normally do to upgrade to the latest release.  I
> would appreciate your comments on this method of upgrading and suggestions for
> what I should try.
> 
> There are Wayland-X11 patches that Fedora distributes to make systems still
> work after the upgrade. 
> 
> I still don't understand how a major factor in Linux, such as KDE can embrace
> MAJOR changes to the system that Break working Systems, your comments are
> welcome.
> 
> Thank you for your comments so far.
> John A. Ward
> 
> > On 09/30/2024 4:40 PM EDT Nate Graham <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> wrote:
> > 
> >  
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=493554
> > 
> > --- Comment #4 from Nate Graham <nate@kde.org> ---
> > I'm asking about the process by which you accomplished this, because to my
> > knowledge Fedora 40 doesn't support Plasma 5.27. If I'm correct and you managed
> > to force it in there through extraordinary means, then I'm afraid KDE won't be
> > able to offer support, because iIt becomes quite possible that any weird random
> > issues you're seeing are the result of components that were not designed to
> > work together being forced to anyway. In this case, you become the system
> > integrator, and responsibility for debugging issues falls on your own
> > shoulders.
> > 
> > -- 
> > You are receiving this mail because:
> > You reported the bug.
> 
> -- 
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You reported the bug.
Comment 7 Nate Graham 2024-10-03 21:35:45 UTC
Are you 100% positive you've actually got Plasma 5.27, and not 6.1?
Comment 8 Bug Janitor Service 2024-10-18 03:47:55 UTC
๐Ÿ›๐Ÿงน โš ๏ธ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug status to REPORTED. If there is no change for at least 30 days, it will be automatically closed as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.

For more information about our bug triaging procedures, please read https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Comment 9 John A. Ward 2024-10-25 01:53:02 UTC
(In reply to Bug Janitor Service from comment #8)
> ๐Ÿ›๐Ÿงน โš ๏ธ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15
> days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug status to
> REPORTED. If there is no change for at least 30 days, it will be
> automatically closed as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.
> 
> For more information about our bug triaging procedures, please read
> https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging.
> 
> Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!

You are correct, my error on reporting, also working on Fedora 39 install.  The Fedora 40 is KDE 6.xx and problem is still critical, I have noticed that one time, the next morning after doing update, reboot, re-arrange icons. the previous day it was ok the next morning, then I started vnc and then the problem returned.  I use an 'older' version of vnc, from
Comment 10 Nate Graham 2024-10-25 17:58:39 UTC
Is the system a desktop, or a laptop?
Comment 11 Bug Janitor Service 2024-11-09 03:46:47 UTC
๐Ÿ›๐Ÿงน โš ๏ธ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug status to REPORTED. If there is no change for at least 30 days, it will be automatically closed as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.

For more information about our bug triaging procedures, please read https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Comment 12 John A. Ward 2024-11-12 20:04:58 UTC
(In reply to Bug Janitor Service from comment #11)
> ๐Ÿ›๐Ÿงน โš ๏ธ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15
> days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug status to
> REPORTED. If there is no change for at least 30 days, it will be
> automatically closed as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.
> 
> For more information about our bug triaging procedures, please read
> https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging.
> 
> Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!

KDE has said the bug is fixed in 6.3, but doing a dnf upgrade hasn't gotten that change yet so I can't verify that problem has been solved, I will respond again when the 6.3 KDE is in Fedora update.  Thank You John
Comment 13 Bug Janitor Service 2024-11-27 03:46:26 UTC
๐Ÿ›๐Ÿงน โš ๏ธ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug status to REPORTED. If there is no change for at least 30 days, it will be automatically closed as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.

For more information about our bug triaging procedures, please read https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Comment 14 John A. Ward 2024-11-27 19:30:38 UTC
I have been doing updates basically every day, the KDE version is 6.2.3 and the problem is still there.  There was a message that the problem has been solved in Version 6.3.x, is Fedora going to include the update OR is there some other way to get the update. I have been in this process for close to 3 months and have had to update the computers  I hope to sell with Fedora 39, which of course is kind of unsupported now.  Thank You for your efforts.  John
Comment 15 John A. Ward 2024-11-27 19:33:07 UTC
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #2)
> How did you manage to get Plasma 5.27 on Fedora KDE 40?

Nate, as I wrote earlier, my fault I looked at a fedora 39 computer, the Fedora 40 is currently 6.2.3
Comment 16 John A. Ward 2024-11-27 19:36:56 UTC
(In reply to Bug Janitor Service from comment #13)
> ๐Ÿ›๐Ÿงน โš ๏ธ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15
> days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug status to
> REPORTED. If there is no change for at least 30 days, it will be
> automatically closed as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.
> 
> For more information about our bug triaging procedures, please read
> https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging.
> 
> Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!

Still doesn't work and current version is 6.2.3
Comment 17 Nate Graham 2024-11-27 20:18:05 UTC
6.2.3 is less than 6.3.0, so logically, yeah, you don't have the change that's supposed to fix it.
Comment 18 Bug Janitor Service 2024-12-12 03:46:39 UTC
๐Ÿ›๐Ÿงน โš ๏ธ This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information, then set the bug status to REPORTED. If there is no change for at least 30 days, it will be automatically closed as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.

For more information about our bug triaging procedures, please read https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging.

Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone!
Comment 19 Bug Janitor Service 2024-12-27 03:47:34 UTC
๐Ÿ›๐Ÿงน This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 30 days. Closing as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.