| Summary: | Option to lock screen when screen turns off | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] systemsettings | Reporter: | Synthetic451 <bugs.kde.org.facelift226> |
| Component: | kcm_screenlocker | Assignee: | Plasma Bugs List <plasma-bugs-null> |
| Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | bandcomposing54, jpetso, kristen, natalie_clarius, nate |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 6.0.4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Arch Linux | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Synthetic451
2024-05-05 05:55:22 UTC
This seems reasonable. I wonder whether this option would be a better fit for the "Screen Locking" configuration module though? There's already a checkbox "Lock after waking from sleep", another one could go right below it saying e.g. "Lock when screen is turned off". The functional difference would be that putting the option there makes it a global setting, rather than per power state profile. Would there be a problem with using the same behavior in all power states? I think personally I am okay with either way, they both have pros and cons. 1. If its in screen locking, it's an easier UI choice I think. That setting controls lock screen behavior it should be in Screen Locking settings. Also having one toggle across all power profiles is just easy. 2. But, having it in a power profile means that a user can configure a different locking experience for docked / undocked modes. Like if I am in the office and it's generally a safe space and I am plugged into AC power, maybe I don't want the screen to constantly lock. However, if I am out in a cafe on battery, then I do. There's benefits to both approaches. I am not sure which one is more optimal. (In reply to Synthetic451 from comment #2) > 2. But, having it in a power profile means that a user can configure a > different locking experience for docked / undocked modes. Like if I am in > the office and it's generally a safe space and I am plugged into AC power, > maybe I don't want the screen to constantly lock. However, if I am out in a > cafe on battery, then I do. Two data points which convinced me that there is no such thing as a generally safe space in the office, even docked at one's own cubicle: * At my last workplace, people who left their laptop unlocked had to buy doughnuts for the rest of the team if someone else managed to send a message from their Slack account. * At an earlier workplace, my dear coworker opened a text editor and pasted repeated lines of "I shall not leave my laptop unlocked" or something to that effect. I'm leaning toward the global setting :) I would also lean towards putting it in the Screen Locking KCM. It would slot right into the existing UI quite nicely:
> Lock screen automatically: [After some duration v]
> [x] After waking from sleep
> [x] When screen turns off
I am definitely okay with this. Would help my workflow a lot. I wonder why this isn't already in KDE. It's extremely frustrating that it's not. |