Bug 485961

Summary: KDE Subversion site references non-existent review board URI.
Product: [Websites] www.kde.org Reporter: Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell <4wy78uwh>
Component: generalAssignee: kde-www mailing-list <kde-www>
Status: RESOLVED INTENTIONAL    
Severity: minor Flags: 4wy78uwh: performance-
Priority: NOR    
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Platform: Fedora RPMs   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://websvn.kde.org/
Latest Commit: Version Fixed In:
Sentry Crash Report:
Attachments: Static example.

Description Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell 2024-04-22 13:51:20 UTC 
SUMMARY
The KDE Subversion site (https://websvn.kde.org/) refers to http://reviewboard.kde.org/ as its, well, review board, but that URI doesn't exist anymore.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
0.  Visit https://websvn.kde.org/
1.  Visit http://reviewboard.kde.org/

OBSERVED RESULT
It doesn't exist.

EXPECTED RESULT
It shouldn't be referenced.

SOFTWARE/OS VERSIONS
Operating System: Fedora Linux 40
KDE Plasma Version: 6.0.4
KDE Frameworks Version: 6.1.0
Qt Version: 6.7.0
Kernel Version: 6.8.7-300.fc40.x86_64 (64-bit)
Graphics Platform: Wayland
Processors: 12 × AMD Ryzen 5 7600X 6-Core Processor
Memory: 30.5 GiB of RAM
Graphics Processor: AMD Radeon RX 5700
Manufacturer: ASRock
Product Name: X670E Taichi
Comment 1 Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell 2024-04-22 13:52:07 UTC 
Created attachment 168799 [details]
Static example.
Comment 2 Ben Cooksley 2024-04-23 08:22:43 UTC 
Subversion is by-and-large deprecated and no longer in use except for translations.
As translations don't use code review tools not sure what the harm of this is?
Comment 3 Roke Julian Lockhart Beedell 2024-04-23 12:04:29 UTC 
(In reply to Ben Cooksley from comment #2)
It was just something I noticed. If it's not worth fixing, just close as WONTFIX – I won't feel like I've wasted time reporting it. Considering that SVN is (sensibly) deprecated, is there a plan to deal with sites like that, or should they just remain up in the spirit of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it?"
Comment 4 Ben Cooksley 2024-04-24 21:11:16 UTC 
Yeah, in this case we'll leave it in place for historical accuracy as it isn't harming anything.