| Summary: | KApplication is gone, but still mentioned in the README file | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Frameworks and Libraries] frameworks-kinit | Reporter: | Christopher Yeleighton <giecrilj> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | David Faure <faure> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | christoph, kdelibs-bugs-null, nate |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 5.101.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | openSUSE | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | file:///usr/share/doc/packages/kinit/README.md | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Christopher Yeleighton
2023-01-01 16:40:25 UTC
> mentioning it is WTF
This isn't how we communicate in KDE. Please tone down the language.
Since this is just an issue in a README file, maybe you can submit a merge request to fix it? Should be easy.
Thanks for the encouragement. The reason why I did not just do it is that it refers to a performance measurement that was run a long ago on hardware that can safely be described as ancient, so just fixing the class name seems to be misleading at best. Do you really want to keep the old text? Well the performance benefits of a thing that's been removed aren't relevant anymore to today's reality, right? I'd recommend opening a merge request and CCing David Edmundson (@davidedmundson) and Albert Astals Cid (@aacid) as they're more familiar with the details of the change itself. The comment was about start-up PENALTY of using KApplication. Including such information about QApplication feels inappropriate because it is not our class. Fixed in master by removing kinit. |