Summary: | Themes don't look like the screenshots | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [I don't know] kde | Reporter: | josvanr <josvanr> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Unassigned bugs mailing-list <unassigned-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED DOWNSTREAM | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | nate |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Kubuntu | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
josvanr
2022-10-24 09:17:18 UTC
Themes provide their own screenshots. If a theme has a screenshot that doesn't match what it actually looks like, that's a fairly embarrassing problem on the part of the theme author. It should be reported to them. Third-party themes you get on store.kde.org are user-provided content, and you need to temper your expectations accordingly. That's why the downloader dialog has a message indicating this. :) hi Graham, hmmm yes I guess I missed that message. And it is kind if fine to have let's say, less structured contributions, but I still think it would be a good idea to have a section with verified, 'official' themes.. Just my 2 cents.. cheers! That's a great idea. It's sort of out of KDE's hands, since this content here is not actually hosted by KDE, but rather the 3rd-party company https://www.pling.com/. We would have to request this functionality from them, coordinate to get it done, integrate a UI for this in the downloader dialog, set up an official process of verification, have a team to do the verification, decide who's on the team (KDE people? Pling people? Both? Someone else), and so on. ...None of which is impossible, of course, but hopefully outlining all of those steps makes it clear how huge of a project this would be. :) |