Summary: | digikam should use ISO date format, or at least the system setting | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | Jonas Stein <kde> |
Component: | Usability-Ergonomy | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
Severity: | minor | CC: | metzpinguin |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 7.9.0 | |
Sentry Crash Report: | |||
Attachments: |
Date with Colons in Metadata
Dateformat in Album Dateformat in File Properties |
Description
Jonas Stein
2022-10-08 21:20:36 UTC
This is a metadata viewer, the metadata is in this date format. A conversion to the ISO format is not desired here. Maik Note that the date metadata fields are strings, ExifTool also decodes them as text, we want to see the actual content. Maik Created attachment 152650 [details]
Dateformat in Album
Created attachment 152651 [details]
Dateformat in File Properties
I confirm, that my example screenshot was a special case. Because this format is exactly the raw data from exif. You can delete the "Date with Colons in Metadata" screenshot, if it confuses. I created screenshots for more general description of the problem. Please reopen. The representation of the date format depending on the application is desired. e.g. long format in the album category or shortened in the properties. Maik |