| Summary: | what about executing exiftool on the NAS instead of the client? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | TiboFA <tibofa> |
| Component: | Metadata-ExifTool | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | caulier.gilles, metzpinguin |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 7.9.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | 8.1.0 | |
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
TiboFA
2022-10-08 14:06:14 UTC
If I remember correctly, the development of ExifTool on NAS by an external developer has stopped. We currently do not plan to support it. Since we need the file anyway to create thumbnails or file hash, we can also use ExifTool locally. Maik (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #1) > If I remember correctly, the development of ExifTool on NAS by an external > developer has stopped. We currently do not plan to support it. Since we need > the file anyway to create thumbnails or file hash, we can also use ExifTool > locally. > > Maik sure, I had to install exiftool directly in the OS, not with a package. interest would not be while creating the thumbnail, but for all the other operations, when thumbnail is already created, and just changing a tag, location or anything else but I fully understand it's not a priority thanks |