| Summary: | All attached drives are not sorted | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] dolphin | Reporter: | Stefan Gies <sgies1963> |
| Component: | bars: location | Assignee: | Dolphin Bug Assignee <dolphin-bugs-null> |
| Status: | REPORTED --- | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | dolphin-bugs-null, meven29, yvan |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 22.08.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: |
Screenshot of my external drives in Dolphin
hardware.txt hardware1.txt hardware2.txt |
||
|
Description
Stefan Gies
2022-09-11 18:24:48 UTC
Could you share the return of the command `solid-hardware list` or `solid-hardware5 list` depending on your system ? And a few of the entries returned by `solid-hardware details udi` where udi is one of the value for one those hard-drives. As a workaround you should be able to reorder the drives manually using drag and drop. Created attachment 157839 [details] hardware.txt Am 02.04.23 um 21:06 schrieb Méven Car: > solid-hardware5 list see hardware.txt Created attachment 157840 [details] hardware1.txt see attachment -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: [dolphin] [Bug 459008] All attached drives are not sorted Datum: 2023-04-02T21:06:14+0200 Von: "Méven Car" <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> An: "sgies1963@t-online.de" <sgies1963@t-online.de> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459008 Méven Car <meven29@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meven29@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Méven Car <meven29@gmail.com> --- Could you share the return of the command `solid-hardware list` or `solid-hardware5 list` depending on your system ? And a few of the entries returned by `solid-hardware details udi` where udi is one of the value for one those hard-drives. Created attachment 157841 [details] hardware2.txt -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: [dolphin] [Bug 459008] All attached drives are not sorted Datum: 2023-04-04T06:06:59+0200 Von: "Stefan Gies" <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> An: "sgies1963@t-online.de" <sgies1963@t-online.de> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459008 --- Comment #4 from Stefan Gies <sgies1963@t-online.de> --- see attachment -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: [dolphin] [Bug 459008] All attached drives are not sorted Datum: 2023-04-02T21:06:14+0200 Von: "Méven Car" <bugzilla_noreply@kde.org> An: "sgies1963@t-online.de" <sgies1963@t-online.de> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459008 Méven Car <meven29@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |meven29@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Méven Car <meven29@gmail.com> --- Could you share the return of the command `solid-hardware list` or `solid-hardware5 list` depending on your system ? And a few of the entries returned by `solid-hardware details udi` where udi is one of the value for one those hard-drives. I am not sure how to fix this. Because harddrive can be added at any point. Users currently can expect devices to be visible in the order the were added. Maintaining an alphabetical order would break this assumption. You already have a simple workaround: reorganize the order by hand. So I am guessing the best thing we could do, is to add a context menu option for devices "sort by name". Do you think Stefan that would be fixing your issue ? Am 05.04.23 um 11:33 schrieb Méven Car: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459008 > > --- Comment #6 from Méven Car <meven29@gmail.com> --- > I am not sure how to fix this. > > Because harddrive can be added at any point. > Users currently can expect devices to be visible in the order the were added. > Maintaining an alphabetical order would break this assumption. > > You already have a simple workaround: reorganize the order by hand. > > So I am guessing the best thing we could do, is to add a context menu option > for devices "sort by name". > Do you think Stefan that would be fixing your issue ? > It's okay |