Summary: | search when show all grouped items as closed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] digikam | Reporter: | fch22 <frederic.chaume> |
Component: | Searches-Engine | Assignee: | Digikam Developers <digikam-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | frederic.chaume, metzpinguin |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version First Reported In: | 7.8.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Other | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
fch22
2022-09-08 14:22:17 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 436040 *** As discussed in the other bug, the search includes all items. Whether they are displayed is a view option. A search with open or closed groups is unnecessary. This flag is also not part of the search, we could think about a display in the status bar like "you still have items in closed groups". Maik (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #2) > As discussed in the other bug, the search includes all items. Whether they > are displayed is a view option. A search with open or closed groups is > unnecessary. > > This flag is also not part of the search, we could think about a display in > the status bar like "you still have items in closed groups". > > Maik Hi Maik I understand , this is a problem of display, but from my point of view, when you are searching for a set of pictures based on criterias , you are expecting to see all result whatever the display options are. That why I was suggesting to override the flag to display a consistent result of a search. Now the message "you still have items in closed groups" is for me just a workaround. Frederic You can't just start from your point of view. There are users who want to "hide" the original/unedited image and also don't want it to appear in a search. Maik (In reply to Maik Qualmann from comment #4) > You can't just start from your point of view. There are users who want to > "hide" the original/unedited image and also don't want it to appear in a > search. > > Maik of course I agree, just sharing my thoughts. |