Summary: | Add to Places should add items above the Trash | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] dolphin | Reporter: | Daniel <code> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Dolphin Bug Assignee <dolphin-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | felixernst, kfm-devel |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 22.04.1 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Fedora RPMs | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Daniel
2022-07-10 09:55:25 UTC
>The user’s curated places are more important than the Trash.
I don't believe this is true. The Trash is in many ways one of the most important things for users to access because it is where they recover data they might have trashed by accident. A user adding more folders to Places doesn't mean they don't value the Trash being there as highly.
I also think it is the most intuitive if "Add to Places" adds the item to the bottom. Otherwise users might have to look for it. Users can change the order later if they want.
I also want to mention that the last position in a list is generally *more* important than the items above it because it is more easily memorised. So if the argument is that user's curated places are more important, putting the item they just curated at the bottom doesn't seem to contradict this notion IMO.
I will mark this as RESOLVED INTENTIONAL for now. But feel free to bring up other arguments if you think my logic is flawed and we can reconsider.
|