| Summary: | The icons for the annotation tools look off when compared to the general look of Okular icons | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] okular | Reporter: | strangequark <random1123581321> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Okular developers <okular-devel> |
| Status: | REPORTED --- | ||
| Severity: | minor | CC: | aacid |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 21.08.3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Neon | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: | screenshot of icons | ||
|
Description
strangequark
2021-11-22 07:10:00 UTC
attach a screenshot. Created attachment 143828 [details]
screenshot of icons
I meant these icons, the ones of the 'Black Freehand Line' and the rest, which look like an actual pen on paper. As compared to the annotation toolbar right below, which has monochrome and simple icons.
Thanks for the screenshot :) I guess it's a matter of taste, and since i don't have a lot of it I don't see anything wrong :D I'll leave it to other contributors with more taste than me to comment :) > This creates another visual discrepancy, because now the > icons *for the same function* are different in different toolbars. This is often misunderstood. The colorful icons select a whole tool (including configuration like color and width), and try to visualize the configuration. The monochrome icons select only the type of the tool, the configuration is done by the right part of the annotation toolbar. (Since the configuration is still unique to each tool, it looks like both icons do the same.) > look ancient and [...] don't look good on low-res displays either. I agree with this. They are ancient (for computers), and they used to be displayed at a much bigger size. They didn’t have text at that time, so they needed to visualize a lot at once. > EXPECTED RESULT > An icon more like the icons in the Annotation Toolbar, and > maybe the icon can be filled with color to show the color of > the selected tool. But the paper at the back looks bad. I think your ideas are welcome. :) |