| Summary: | Make Kickoff menu re-sizable | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Plasma] plasmashell | Reporter: | m11.1l1.f64 |
| Component: | Application Launcher (Kickoff) widget | Assignee: | David Edmundson <kde> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INTENTIONAL | ||
| Severity: | wishlist | CC: | mikel5764, nate, plasma-bugs-null |
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | 5.23.3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 1.0 | ||
| Platform: | Manjaro | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: |
Before
After |
||
|
Description
m11.1l1.f64
2021-11-21 09:14:39 UTC
Why? What's the problem you're facing with the current size? (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #1) > Why? What's the problem you're facing with the current size? I really have issues with the current size. The padding between icons are too low, kickoff size is too small, texts are compact, etc. Let me show the difference between the new kickoff and the previous version of it on my desktop. Check out the new attachments and compare them. It's really a crucial part of desktop for me! Created attachment 143894 [details]
Before
Created attachment 143895 [details]
After
Thanks. I asked because making the window resizable would not make the overall layout's margins larger. In general it's a good idea to describe the complain or the problem rather than proposing a solution. People don't know what problem you're having, so they have no way to gauge whether the solution would actually fix the problem or not. And in this case, it wouldn't. :) The current design is the intended appearance. We deliberately wanted to make its margins more compact, to match the compact margins used everywhere else. Changing this to go back would re-introduce the visual inconsistency that we wanted to avoid, and that other pepole complained about. (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5) > Thanks. I asked because making the window resizable would not make the > overall layout's margins larger. In general it's a good idea to describe the > complain or the problem rather than proposing a solution. People don't know > what problem you're having, so they have no way to gauge whether the > solution would actually fix the problem or not. And in this case, it > wouldn't. :) > > The current design is the intended appearance. We deliberately wanted to > make its margins more compact, to match the compact margins used everywhere > else. Changing this to go back would re-introduce the visual inconsistency > that we wanted to avoid, and that other pepole complained about. You're completely right. I was a bit unclear So you're saying I'll never be able to change its size? I know it may seem inconsistent but the option to change its size and margins together can improve the user experience, right? That's correct, sorry. :) (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #7) > That's correct, sorry. :) So it will take into implementation? |