Summary: | Wish larger zoom in Dolphin & inter-thumbnails width reduced or controlled | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] dolphin | Reporter: | phil4000n |
Component: | panels: places | Assignee: | Dolphin Bug Assignee <dolphin-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | kfm-devel, nate |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | 21.08.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | 21.08 | |
Sentry Crash Report: | |||
Attachments: |
illustrates the inter-thumbnails space
Thumbnails inter-space extra large thumbnails Dolphin vs XnViewMP interspace thumbnails |
Description
phil4000n
2021-07-24 15:55:09 UTC
Created attachment 140301 [details]
Thumbnails inter-space
This is fixed in Dolphin 21.08 already, happily. Not fixed for me in Dolphin 21.08 KDE Framework 5.85.0 Qt 5.15.2 Perhaps I misunderstood the original bug. Can you please explain in more detail what the exact problem is? Request 1: Dolphin's user how to decide to watch ultra large thumbnails. Attached an example with XnViewMP Created attachment 140901 [details]
extra large thumbnails
I understand that Dolphin is "justifying" the inter-space width between the thumbnails in accordance to the view panel width. However, I seems I can not "tile" the thumbnails as close I wish, whatever thumbnail size I choose. Aka: I personnaly wish, to have a lesser minimal inter-space between the thumbnails, to show more of them. But some users, might not like that, so just permit the users to configure how he/she wants. Thanks See attachment XnViewMP vs Dolphin Created attachment 140902 [details]
Dolphin vs XnViewMP interspace thumbnails
There is already a setting for that. :) Dolphin settings window > View Modes > Icons > Label Width > Small >Dolphin settings window > View Modes > Icons > Label Width > Small Didn't know, but no change for btw small and medium. what about comment 5: Allow Dolphin's user how to decide to watch with ultra large thumbnails, aka much larger than now, see 3rd attachment thanks |