| Summary: | weird size of inc tar when slicing | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] kbackup | Reporter: | Philippe ROUBACH <philippe.roubach> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Martin Koller <martin> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | NOR | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | openSUSE | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
| Attachments: | the backup profile i use | ||
|
Description
Philippe ROUBACH
2021-03-20 08:45:00 UTC
You can not predict (easily) the size of the "inc" slices, since it's the incremental part which contains only the changes after the last full backup. Or do you say you have exactly the same preconditions and get different sizes of the inc parts ? Yes the 2 backups are the same backups. The only difference is the slicing or not. 700 MB for an inc tar from Sunday to Monday I can't believe, so many files are modified. 16 GB for an inc tar from Sunday to Monday there is a problem somewhere. Created attachment 136873 [details]
the backup profile i use
I'd say you check the content of the inc tar files to see if there is something in it which should not be. I made an error. In fact there is no problem. |