Summary: | Strange behaviour using MELD to compare files | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Applications] krusader | Reporter: | Rafael Linux User <rafael.linux.user> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | Krusader Bugs Distribution List <krusader-bugs-null> |
Status: | REPORTED --- | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | davide, krusader-bugs-null, rafael.linux.user, toni.asensi |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version First Reported In: | 2.7.2 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
Rafael Linux User
2020-11-12 14:38:23 UTC
Meld is not officially supported for an inline comparison as it belong to the Gnome ecosystem (kdiff3 and kompare does). As you said, kio-extras does not solve this (and it shouldn't). The solution should be detecting if kio-fuse is present and Meld could handle it; moving to wishlist. I asked MELD developers too, and unfortunately, this was their answer: Kai Willadsen Kai Willadsen @kaiw ยท 1 week ago Maintainer "File selector enhancement requests should be filed against GTK+. As far as I'm concerned, this goes for both using the native QT file selector (since it's implemented via a portal interface that currently supports Windows and OSX afaik) and adding server connection into the selector dialog. Meld isn't going to implement these ourselves, since we simply don't have the resources to maintain that. I'll leave this bug open on the off-chance that we've done something that interferes with an existing QT file selector portal." So I must forget MELD in my day to day job. > However after I select 2 (remote or local) files, Krusader launchs MELD
> and give it two "temporal" files (copies from the original ones) so
> when I save from MELD changes, they are not saved and I lost the changes.
It's strange. Using Kubuntu 20.04 and its Meld: local files are compared "as they are", without temporal files, therefore changes are saved in the original files. Does the same happen to you?
(In reply to Toni Asensi Esteve from comment #3) > > However after I select 2 (remote or local) files, Krusader launchs MELD > > and give it two "temporal" files (copies from the original ones) so > > when I save from MELD changes, they are not saved and I lost the changes. > > It's strange. Using Kubuntu 20.04 and its Meld: local files are compared "as > they are", without temporal files, therefore changes are saved in the > original files. Does the same happen to you? I'm not sure if that question is for me (I opened this issue) but, yes, that works for me same way and that's how it should work over network folders, transparently, and remembering between Plasma sessions where that opened files where located. Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDSINFO status with no change for at least 15 days. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and set the bug status as REPORTED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDSINFO status with no change in 30 days the bug will be closed as RESOLVED > WORKSFORME due to lack of needed information. For more information about our bug triaging procedures please read the wiki located here: https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Bug_triaging If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as REPORTED so that the KDE team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make KDE software even better for everyone! Needsinfo? Needs fix. Info is exposed. What more can users do??? Rafael: Meanwhile, if you want to use Meld: - If you access your remote files using Samba, have you tried "mounting" a "samba share" using some of the results of https://www.google.com/search?q=mount+samba ? - If you access your remote files using FTP, have you tried "mounting" a "samba share" using some of the results of https://www.google.com/search?q=mount+ftp ? I meant: Meanwhile, if you want to use Meld: - If you access your remote files using Samba, have you tried "mounting" a "samba share" using some of the results of https://www.google.com/search?q=mount+samba ? - If you access your remote files using FTP, have you tried {"mounting" a remote FTP folder as a local folder} using some of the results of https://www.google.com/search?q=mount+ftp ? Hi Toni Thank you for your recommendations. More than 5 years ago, to mount remote folders was the only workaround. Today, we have kio-fuse that works, so to mount each one of the DISTINCT remote samba/ftp folders than I need to access, would be like to make steps backward. Thanks, Rafael, that's a reason of this bug report (for people who use programs with the aforementioned characteristics). |