Summary: | KIO filesystem actions are very slow for small files | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Frameworks and Libraries] frameworks-kio | Reporter: | Valentin Petzel <bug.kde> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | KIO Bugs <kio-bugs-null> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | bugseforuns, kdelibs-bugs-null |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Debian unstable | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: | |||
Attachments: | IO using cp and kcp |
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 342056 *** |
Created attachment 132618 [details] IO using cp and kcp Copying files over KIO is significantly slower than native filesystem actions when performing on many small files. I did a test with 40000 files of 50K for a) On a tmpfs cp took about a second, kcp took about 6 seconds. I guess this is a good measure of the cpu overhead of KIO copy. b) On a hard drive cp took about 53 seconds, kcp took about 3m41s. Now this is a very significant difference. I monitored the process in KSysGuard, and I found that copying over KIO leads to much less reading operations per second and a much lower reading speed, as you can see from the attached screenshots. (kcp reads data at about 1/10 of the rate of cp!) I guess one possible reason for this could be an artificial limit to read ops to prevent system freezes on copy operations?