| Summary: | Filedigger launcher is confusing rsync users | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Applications] kup | Reporter: | Ezike Ebuka <yerimyah1> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Simon Persson <simon.persson> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOT A BUG | ||
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | LO | ||
| Version First Reported In: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Platform: | Other | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Latest Commit: | Version Fixed/Implemented In: | ||
| Sentry Crash Report: | |||
|
Description
Ezike Ebuka
2020-09-21 09:10:41 UTC
Filedigger was created to allow a merged view of backups, for each file or folder the user can see a list of timestamps and open or restore that specific one. For rsync type of backups that makes no sense since there only ever is one version saved. Also, since the users files are saved at the backup location just as a stright simple copy then it makes sense to just use a file browser to look at the saved files. User can copy anything they need from there. Keeping this bug report open since clearly there is improvement potential in how kup presents information, labeling of buttons etc. to make it clear what the user should expect from interacting with kup. Any suggestion for how to avoid misunderstandings is appreciated! Thank you for taking the time to report! when using timeshift there different timestamp backup more like versioned backup to a particular time before, so you have different copies based on the time the backup was made as i thought it was case here. just to add, bup package is no longer available in many distros like ubuntu based, arch and manjaro as far as i know because it uses python2 and it is now obselete, making rsync the only option for a backup with kup right now. Closing this bug. Nobody has suggested any better wording to avoid misunderstanding, I don't know how to make it clearer. |