Summary: | encryption icon needs manual click | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Unmaintained] kmail | Reporter: | David Bishop <tech> |
Component: | encryption | Assignee: | kdepim bugs <kdepim-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED WAITINGFORINFO | ||
Severity: | wishlist | CC: | luigi.toscano |
Priority: | NOR | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Platform: | Compiled Sources | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Latest Commit: | Version Fixed In: | ||
Sentry Crash Report: |
Description
David Bishop
2002-05-13 22:58:02 UTC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 14 May 2002 6:03 am Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote: > On Tuesday 14 May 2002 07:36 Volker Augustin wrote: > .. > > > Whether a message is signed and encrypted is only clear after the whole > > message has been downloaded and processed. So a background process would > > have to download all messages and thus not an option normally. Of course > > the same is true for an action to "select all and have it check them that > > way". People with metered internet access would kill us for this and I > > suppose almost everyone would kill the kmail developers because of the > > performance decrease. > > ACK. I don't think you understand. I'm talking about email that I have already downloaded and "processed" i.e. it's local (no more downloading required at least for non-imap). And this would only have to happen once as every other email is "processed" as soon as it comes in. Does this make sense? I have 10K+ emails already in KMail's folders. And the performance decrease isn't really applicable because I'm not asking for a change in the *normal* operation just something akin to kmailcvt that would "convert" the messages to have the right icon (non-double?). Of course this would only make sense if the bug you mention below is fixed :-) > > I realized however that the icons state is not cached in the index > > files. Is this done on purpose (e.g. for security reasons)? > > No that's a bug in our code. I figured so so I wasn't worrying about it. - -- D.A.Bishop -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE84RODEHLN/FXAbC0RApcTAKCX1/gizaBRTUFuZjT+RsgccYUv0QCfZWxe HkI8eDhe9Cw1ZS4qhQ+vFvE= =JvqI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thank you for your feature request. Kmail1 is currently unmaintained so we are closing all wishes. Please feel free to reopen a feature request for Kmail2 if it has not already been implemented. Thank you for your understanding. Instead of creating a new feature request, please confirm here if the wishlist is still valid for kmail2. |